Advanced search×

A framework for improving the quality of health information on the world-wide-web and bettering public (e-)health: the MedCERTAIN approach.

Stud Health Technol Inform 84(Pt 2):1450-4 (2001) PMID 11604966

There has been considerable debate about the variable quality of health information on the world-wide-web and its impact on public health. While central authorities to regulate, control, censor, or centrally approve information, in-formation providers or websites are neither realistic nor desirable, public health professionals are interested in making systems available that direct patient streams to the best available information sources. National governments and medical societies have also recognized their responsibility to help users to identify "good quality" information sources. But what constitutes good quality, and how can such a system be implemented in a decentralized and democratic manner? This paper presents a model which combines aspects of consumer education, encouragement of best practices among information providers, self-labeling and external evaluations. The model is currently being implemented and evaluated in the MedCERTAIN project, funded by the European Union under the Action Plan for Safer Use of the Internet. The aim is to develop a technical and organisational infrastructure for a pilot system that allows consumers to access metainformation about web-sites and health information providers, including disclosure information from health providers and opinions of external evaluators. The paper explains the general conceptual framework of the model and presents preliminary experiences including results from an expert consensus meeting, where the framework was discussed.

Version: za2963e q8za2 q8zb5 q8zcf q8zd4 q8ze0 q8zf6 q8zgd

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. A Randomized Controlled Trial comparing the efficacy of low-dose amitriptyline, amitriptyline with pindolol and surrogate placebo in the tre...

    Rhinology 51(2):143-53 (2013) PMID 23671895

    Patients often present to otolaryngologists with chronic facial pain, presumed to be of sinus origin despite normal nasal endoscopy and sinus CT. This pain has increasingly been recognized as being of neurological origin with one of the commonest underlying causes being mid-facial se...
  2. Evaluating the impact of a quality of life assessment with feedback for clinicians in patients with schizophrenia: randomised controlled tri...

    Br J Psychiatry (2013) PMID 23661768

    Quality of life feedback positively influences patient satisfaction, which confirms the relevance of measuring QoL in clinical practice. The absence of a significant effect of QoL feedback on clinical outcomes also suggests that clinicians did not use these data optimally. Our findings suggest a noc...
  3. Assessing the quality of life of health-referred children and adolescents with short stature: development and psychometric testing of the Qo...

    Health Qual Life Outcomes 11(1):76 (2013) PMID 23648112

    The QoLISSY questionnaire is a promising step forward in assessing the impact of dSS on HrQoL. It is based on items generated from the subjective experience of short stature children referred for endocrine investigation, is validated for use in five languages and it is easy to administer in clinical...