Advanced search×

Medicalizing abortion decisions.

Thomas Murphy TM Goodwin

First Things (1996) PMID 11660224

Version: za2963e q8zae q8zb4 q8zcb q8zd0 q8ze1 q8zf7 q8zgf

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Unintended Consequences: Abortion Training in the Years After Roe v Wade.
    Sarp S Aksel, Lydia L Fein, and Lois L Backus

    Am J Public Health (N Y) 103(3):404-7 (2013) PMID 23327239

    The US Supreme Court's 1973 Roe v Wade decision had clear implications for American women's reproductive rights and physician ability to carry out patient choices. Its effect on physician abortion training was less apparent. In an effort to increase patient access to abortions after...
  2. It is time to integrate abortion into primary care.
    Susan S Yanow

    Am J Public Health (N Y) 103(1):14-6 (2013) PMID 23153160

    The Roe v Wade decision made safe abortion available but did not change the reality that more than 1 million women face an unwanted pregnancy every year. Forty years after Roe v Wade, the procedure is not accessible to many US women. The politics of abortion have led to a plethora of laws that creat...
  3. The Frequencies of the Urinary Anomalies which were Detected in a Foetal Autopsy Study.
    Tulika T Gupta, Kanchan K Kapoor, and A A Huria

    pubmed 6(10):1615-9 1 Dec 2012 PMID 23373012

    The detection of foetal urinary abnormalities in the antenatal period will help in an adequate post natal management and it will also have a bearing on the decision of the termination of the pregnancy. The purpose of the present study was to detect urinary anomalies in the antenatal period by doing a...