Advanced search×

Cytokine expression profiles during murine contact allergy: T helper 2 cytokines are expressed irrespective of the type of contact allergen.

Arch Toxicol 75(8):470-9 (2001) PMID 11757671

We have investigated the cytokine response pattern following sensitisation (induction) of BALB/c mice with different chemicals (dinitrochlorobenzene, dinitrofluorobenzene, oxazolone, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, trimellitic anhydride, croton oil) and elicitation (challenge) of contact allergy in sensitised animals. The results of our investigations showed that different chemicals induced both T helper (Th) 1 cytokines [interleukin (IL) 2, interferon beta (IFNgamma) [corrected] and Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-10) at different stages during murine contact allergy. We also confirmed our previous findings that IL-4 and IL-10 release were up-regulated during the challenge phase regardless the contact allergen used, whereas the release of IFNgamma [corrected] did not show a clear preference for being up- or down-regulated. In our hands, the increased expression of Th2 cytokines after challenge exposure to contact allergens appeared as a stable marker of secondary contact allergenic responses. Quantitative differences in the expression of IL-4 were observed between different contact allergens. The present results clearly indicate that skin sensitisers were able to elicit cytokine response patterns, which could not be related to a clear-cut Th1 or Th2 type of cytokine response. Furthermore, dermal application of contact allergens produced different kinetics of cytokine secretion upon induction and challenge. In our hands, the co-expression of Th1 and Th2 type cytokines appeared as a universal consequence of dermal application of contact allergens to responsive mice. Our results indicate that co-expression of Th1 and Th2 cytokines during contact allergy is an important feature of murine contact allergy in responsive mice and that chemicals differ in their potency to induce the expression of these cytokines. Furthermore, the results do not support the view that different chemicals induce Th1 or Th2 cytokines in a mutually exclusive manner depending on their preference for inducing either contact or respiratory allergy. The results are expected to renew the discussion about the usefulness of the Th1/Th2 paradigm in certain areas of immunotoxicology.

Version: za2963e q8za2 q8zb7 q8zc1 q8zd2 q8ze9 q8zf5 q8zg7

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters: implications for risk assessment and epidemiology.

    Int J Androl 31(2):233-40 (2008) PMID 18248400

    During the last years, a series of studies on combinations of oestrogenic, thyroid-disrupting and anti-androgenic chemicals at low doses have been published. The available experimental evidence shows that combination effects may result from endocrine disrupters that each produces very small effects,...
  2. Effects of endocrine disruptors on obesity.

    Int J Androl 31(2):201-8 (2008) PMID 18315718

    We summarize the literature reporting an association of EDCs and the development of obesity, and further describe an animal model of exposure to diethylstilbestrol that has proven useful in studying mechanisms involved in abnormal programming of various oestrogen target tissues during differentiatio...