Deconstructing, reconstructing, preserving Paul E. Meehl's legacy of construct validity.
Psychol Assess 17(4):415-22 (2005) PMID 16393008
The question of the status of cause-and-effect explanations of human behavior that posit physically existing causative factors and those that, on the other hand, posit hypothetical entities in the form of "useful fictions" has a long history. The influence of the works of Jeremy Bentham and Hans Vaihinger, as well as the later influence of Francis Galton, is described. Issues of the validity of hypothetical constructs and related problems of measurement and definition as found in psychoanalytic theory construction and in trait theory are examined. The significant and continuing interest generated by the landmark studies of K. MacCorquodale and P. E. Meehl (1948) and L. J. Cronbach and P. E. Meehl (1955) as well as the central importance of P. E. Meehl's thinking are described.
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.415
Version: za2963e q8za0 q8zb6 q8zcf q8zd2 q8zea q8zf4 q8zg9