Advanced search×

Evaluation of a commercial in-house test kit for the semi-quantitative assessment of microalbuminuria in cats.

J Feline Med Surg 8(4):269-78 (2006) PMID 16781178

Proteinuria was assessed in 100 randomly selected sick cats and 22 healthy cats by means of the urine protein:creatinine ratio, a traditional urine "dipstick" and a commercial ELISA-based dipstick designed to detect microalbuminuria (MA) semi-quantitatively. In addition the repeatability and reproducibility of the MA test was assessed by comparing results of five replicate tests of 26 urine samples, interpreted by two different readers. Discrepancies existed in the replicate test result in 23 and 27% of the samples examined by reader 1 and 2, respectively, and on several occasions this discrepancy was between whether the sample was "positive" or "negative" for MA. The inter-reader agreement was good (kappa=0.75), but again discrepancies were noted and part of the reason for these problems appeared to be the necessary subjectivity in the interpretation of colour changes when reading test results. Proteinuria was significantly (P< or =0.014) more prevalent in the sick than the healthy cats with 36 and 9%, respectively, having detectable MA, 34 and 5%, respectively, having a urine protein to creatinine (UPC) ratio >0.5, and 84 and 9%, respectively, having positive urine protein dipstick analysis. There was a moderate significant correlation between UPC ratio and MA concentrations (r(s)=0.68, P< or =0.5 had positive MA results, 10/84 cats with negative MA results had a UPC ratio >0.5, and none of these had evidence of lower urinary tract disease. This study confirmed that MA and proteinuria are commonly seen in cats with a variety of diseases, but they are not necessarily both elevated, and the UPC ratio can be elevated without an increase in MA results. Furthermore, some repeatability problems were demonstrated with the semi-quantitative MA test. These findings demonstrate that the semi-quantitative MA test should not be relied on as the sole determinant of proteinuria.

Version: za2963e q8za6 q8zbf q8zc0 q8zda q8ze6 q8zfb q8zg0

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Proteinuria: accuracy and precision of laboratory diagnosis by dip-stick analysis.

    Clin Chem 24(11):1934-9 (1978) PMID 709825

    We studied and compared results of two urine dip-stick procedures for protein with those of quantitative measurements of total protein and albumin in urine. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of "normal" and "abnormal" dip-stick results, assay efficiency, technologist precision, and meth...
  2. Accuracy and precision of urinary pH determinations using two commercially available dipsticks.

    Am J Clin Pathol 70(3):368-74 (1978) PMID 30274

    The accuracy and precision of urinary pH determinations using commercially available dipsticks were studied. Two products were evaluated by 17 MT(ASCP) technologists over the pH range 4.5 to 9.0. The study included accuracy, reproducibility, variation among technologists, and variation between produ...
  3. Agreement between two methods for measuring urine pH in cats and dogs.

    J Am Vet Med Assoc 213(7):996-8 (1998) PMID 9776996

    Mean difference (+/- 2 SD) between the 2 methods was 0.1 +/- 0.9 pH units. Only 65 of 164 (40%) samples measured by use of a dipstrip were within 0.25 pH units of results obtained by use of the pH meter. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: When an accurate measurement of urine pH is critical for clinical decisio...