Advanced search×

Masticatory muscle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite.

Eur J Orthod 29(2):149-56 (2007) PMID 17317862

Few investigations have evaluated the characteristics of functional and structural malocclusion in young children. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the ultrasonographic thickness of the masseter and anterior portion of the temporalis muscles, the maximum bite force, and the number of occlusal contacts in children with normal occlusion and unilateral crossbite, in the primary and early mixed dentition. Forty-nine children (26 males and 23 females) was divided into four groups: primary-normal occlusion (PNO), mean (PNO) age 58.67 months; primary-crossbite (PCB), mean age 60.50 months; mixed-normal occlusion (MNO), mean age 72.85 months; and mixed-crossbite (MCB), mean age 71.91 months. Thickness was evaluated with the muscles at rest and during maximal clenching, and comparison was made between the right and left side (normal occlusion), and between the normal and crossbite side (crossbite). The results were analysed using Pearson's correlation, paired and unpaired t-test, and Mann-Whitney ranked sum test. The anterior temporalis thickness at rest was statistically thicker for the crossbite side than the normal side in the MCB group (P = 0.0106). A statistical difference in bite force and the number of occlusal contacts was observed between the MNO and MCB groups, with greater values for the MNO subjects (P < 0.05). Masseter muscle thickness showed a positive correlation with bite force, but the anterior temporalis thickness in the PCB and MCB groups was not related to bite force. Masticatory muscle thickness and bite force did not present a significant correlation with occlusal contacts, weight, or height. It was concluded that functional and anatomical variables differ in the early mixed dentition in the presence of a malocclusion and early diagnosis and treatment planning should be considered.

DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjl089
Version: za2963e q8zad q8zb8 q8zc4 q8zdc q8ze6 q8zfb q8zg6

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Ultrasonography of masseter muscle size in normal young adults.

    J Oral Rehabil 22(2):129-34 (1995) PMID 7722744

    The present study was planned to determine the relationship between linear dimensions of human masseter muscle cross-section and cross-sectional area (CSA), and to assess symmetry between the two sides in normal young adults. Cross-sectional images of the masseter muscle were measured bilaterally by...
  2. Masseter muscle hypertrophy. Aetiology and therapy.

    J Maxillofac Surg 14(6):344-8 (1986) PMID 3467004

    We should refer to it as hyperplasia rather than hypertrophy of the masseteric muscle. Excision of the internal layer of the masseter muscle and reduction of the thickened bone in the region of the mandibular angle, via an intraoral approach, is the treatment of choice. Immediately after surgery it...
  3. Evaluation of changes in muscle thickness, bite force and facial asymmetry during early treatment of functional posterior crossbite.

    J Clin Pediatr Dent 34(4):369-74 (2010) PMID 20831143

    Bite force and temporalis thickness increased from s1 to s2 and s3 in both groups (p < 0.05). Body mass index (BMI) increased significantly from s1 to s3 only in the MixG, but the masseter thickness did not differ among the stages. The correlation between the angle of the eye and the angle of the mo...