Advanced search×

A transcendental argument for the concept of personhood in neuroscience.

Mark Sagoff

Am J Bioeth 7(1):72-3; discussion W1-4 (2007) PMID 17366178

DOI: 10.1080/15265160601064355
Version: za2963e q8za2 q8zba q8zce q8zd9 q8ze4 q8zf9 q8zg4

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle.
    Benedetto Rocchi

    J Med Ethics 39(5):e6-e10 (2013) PMID 23637458

    This paper discusses the issue of 'post-birth abortion' from an applied perspective. Three hypothetical situations where a newborn considered as a 'potential person' is at risk of being killed are proposed to highlight the potential controversial outcomes of post-birth abortion. The...
  2. Do mutator mutations fuel tumorigenesis?
    Edward J Fox, Marc J Prindle, and Lawrence A Loeb

    Cancer Metastasis Rev (2013) PMID 23592419

    We present recent evidence in support of the mutator phenotype hypothesis, major arguments against this concept, and discuss the clinical consequences of tumor evolution fueled by an elevated mutation rate. We also consider the therapeutic possibility of altering the rate of mutation accumulation. M...
  3. The right to know your genetic parents: from open-identity gamete donation to routine paternity testing.
    An Ravelingien and Guido Pennings

    Am J Bioeth 13(5):33-41 (2013) PMID 23557045

    We trace the arguments that underlie this claim and question its implications. We argue that, given the status attributed to the right to know one's gamete donor, it would be discriminatory not to extend this right to naturally conceived children with misattributed paternity. One way to facilitate t...