Advanced search×

[Comparison of two forms of nasal and pharyngeal topical anestesia for performing esophageal manometry].

Ramón R Carmona-Sánchez, David D Esmer-Sánchez, and Fernando Alvarez FA Tostado-Fernández

Rev Gastroenterol Mex 72(2):100-3 (2007) PMID 17966368

The esophageal manometry (EM) is an invasive procedure that causes nasal pain, pharyngeal pain, and nausea. A topical anesthetic may improve tolerance of the examination.

Version: za2963e q8zac q8zba q8zc2 q8zdf q8zed q8zf9 q8zg2
Buy PDF

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Chromatographic separation and detection of target analytes from complex samples using inkjet printed SERS substrates.
    Wei W Yu and Ian M White

    Analyst (2013) PMID 23671906

    We build upon our previous work on inkjet-printed SERS substrates by using paper and polymer membranes to integrate sample cleanup and analyte separation with SERS detection. Inkjet-printed paper SERS substrates provide a highly sensitive chemical detection platform of unprecedented cost and simplic...
    Buy PDF
  2. Hsp70 targets a cytoplasmic quality control substrate to the San1p ubiquitin ligase.
    Christopher J Guerriero, Kurt F Weiberth, and Jeffrey L Brodsky

    J Biol Chem (2013) PMID 23653356

    We sought to draw a direct comparison between ERAD and CytoQC by studying the elimination of a single misfolded domain that, depending on its residence, is disposed by either these pathways. The truncated, second nucleotide binding domain (NBD2*) from a yeast ERAD substrate, Ste6p*, resides at the c...
    PDF not found
  3. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with (18)F-fl...
    Masatoyo Nakajo, Masayuki Nakajo, and Chihaya Koriyama

    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2013) PMID 23653240

    All 30 primary cancers (43.0 ± 20.0 mm, range 14 - 85 mm) were visualized by both tracers, but none of the FLT SUVmax values exceeded the FDG SUVmax values in any of the primary cancers (6.6 ± 2.4 vs. 13.6 ± 5.8, p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detect...
    Buy PDF