Advanced search×

Economic evaluation of an intensive group training protocol compared with usual care physiotherapy in patients with chronic low back pain.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(4):445-51 (2008) PMID 18277878

STUDY DESIGN: Economic evaluation from a societal perspective conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial with a follow-up of 52 weeks. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness and cost utility of an intensive group training protocol compared with usual care physiotherapy in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. The intensive group training protocol combines exercise therapy, back school, and behavioral principles. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Two studies found a significant reduction in absenteeism for a graded activity program in occupational health care. This program has not yet been evaluated in a primary care physiotherapy setting. METHODS: Participating physical therapists in primary care recruited 114 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eligible patients were randomized to either the protocol group or the guideline group. Outcome measures included functional status (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), pain intensity (11-point numerical rating scale), general perceived effect and quality of life (EuroQol-5D). Cost data were measured with cost diaries and included direct and indirect costs related to low back pain. RESULTS: After 52 weeks, the direct health care costs were significantly higher for patients in the protocol group, largely due to the costs of the intervention. The mean difference in total costs amounted to [Euro sign] 233 (95% confidence interval: [Euro sign] -2.185; [Euro sign] 2.764). The cost-effectiveness planes indicated no significant differences in cost effectiveness between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this economic evaluation showed no difference in total costs between the protocol group and the guideline group. The differences in effects were small and not statistically significant. At present, national implementation of the protocol is not recommended.

DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318163fa59
Version: za2963e q8zaf q8zb6 q8zc2 q8zd7 q8ze0 q8zff q8zg1

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Effects of 3 months of short sessions of controlled whole body vibrations on the risk of falls among nursing home residents.

    BMC Geriatr 13(1):42 (2013) PMID 23647914

    The whole body vibration training performed with the exposition settings such as those used in this research was feasible but seems to have no impact on the risk of falls among nursing home residents. Further investigations, in which, for example, the exposure parameters would be changed, seem neces...
  2. Current prevention practice for venous thromboembolism in Japanese intensive care units.

    J Anesth (2013) PMID 23649918

    We performed a point-prevalence survey of Japanese ICUs in training facilities for intensive care specialists. We recorded data from five consecutive ICU patients in each facility at any time on the day of the survey. A total of 470 patients were registered in this study. VTE prophylaxis was receive...
  3. Impact of an early education multimedia intervention in managing nutrition-related chemotherapy side effects: a pilot study.

    SpringerPlus 2(1):179 (2013) PMID 23658857

    The purpose of the educational intervention was to measure changes in knowledge, perceived benefit of nutrition, and perceived self efficacy in handling side effects of chemotherapy before and after viewing a 15 minute DVD among patients with cancer. A convenience sa...