Advanced search×

The NIOSH Radiation Dose Reconstruction Program: origin, goals, scope, and results.

Dade W DW Moeller and Richard E RE Toohey

Health Phys 95(1):1-5 (2008) PMID 18545023

DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000312372.98972.30
Version: za2963e q8za3 q8zb1 q8zc6 q8zd1 q8ze9 q8zfc q8zg3

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Preclinical radiation dosimetry for the novel SV2A radiotracer [18F]UCB-H.
    Florian Bretin, Geoffrey Warnock, and Alain Plenevaux

    EJNMMI Res 3(1):35 (2013) PMID 23647774

    This first preclinical dosimetry study of [18F]UCB-H showed that the tracer meets the standard criteria for radiation exposure in clinical studies. The dose-limiting organ based on US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European guidelines was the urinary bladder wall for FDA and the effective do...
  2. First in vivo head-to-head comparison of high-definition versus standard-definition stent imaging with 64-slice computed tomography.
    Tobias A Fuchs, Julia Stehli, and Philipp A Kaufmann

    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2013) PMID 23636300

    The aim of this study was to compare image quality characteristics from 64-slice high definition (HDCT) versus 64-slice standard definition CT (SDCT) for coronary stent imaging. In twenty-five stents of 14 patients, undergoing contrast-enhanced CCTA both on 64-slice SDCT (LightSpeedV...
  3. Vaginal dose point reporting in cervical cancer patients treated with combined 2D/3D external beam radiotherapy and 2D/3D brachytherapy.
    Henrike Westerveld, Richard Pötter, and Christian Kirisits

    Radiother Oncol (2013) PMID 23639578

    The method was applicable to all patients. Total EQD2 doses at PIBS and ±2cm were 36.7Gy (3.1-68.2), 49.6Gy (32.1-89.6) and 4.3Gy (1.0-46.6). At the vaginal surface at ring level doses were respectively 266.1Gy (67.6-814.5)/225.9Gy (61.5-610.5) at 3/9o'clock, and 85.1Gy (55.4-140.3)/72.0Gy (49.1-10...