Advanced search×

Multifinality in the development of personality disorders: A Biology × Sex × Environment interaction model of antisocial and borderline traits

Dev Psychopathol 21(03):735 (2009) PMID 19583882 PMCID PMC2709751

Although antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is more common among males and borderline PD (BPD) is more common among females, some authors have suggested that the two disorders reflect multifinal outcomes of a single etiology. This assertion is based on several overlapping symptoms and features, including trait impulsivity, emotional lability, high rates of depression and suicide, and a high likelihood of childhood abuse and/or neglect. Furthermore, rates of ASPD are elevated in the first degree relatives of those with BPD, and concurrent comorbidity rates for the two disorders are high. In this article, we present a common model of antisocial and borderline personality development. We begin by reviewing issues and problems with diagnosing and studying PDs in children and adolescents. Next, we discuss dopaminergic and serotonergic mechanisms of trait impulsivity as predisposing vulnerabilities to ASPD and BPD. Finally, we extend shared risk models for ASPD and BPD by specifying genetic loci that may confer differential vulnerability to impulsive aggression and mood dysregulation among males and impulsive self-injury and mood dysregulation among females. Although the precise mechanisms of these sex-moderated genetic vulnerabilities remain poorly understood, they appear to interact with environmental risk factors including adverse rearing environments to potentiate the development of ASPD and BPD.

DOI: 10.1017/S0954579409000418
Version: za2963e q8za0 q8zb5 q8zc0 q8zd8 q8ze7 q8zfd q8zgb

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Impact of the U.S. panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine.

    Am J Prev Med 22(2):98-105 (2002) PMID 11818178

    We found evidence that the Panel Report had an impact on practice. However, 31% of the studies citing the Panel Report did not follow the recommendation to use a 3% discount rate, and only 28% followed all three recommendations....
  2. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.

    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 82(4):591-605 (2007) PMID 17944619

    We advocate presentation of measures of the magnitude of effects (i.e. effect size statistics) and their confidence intervals (CIs) in all biological journals. Combined use of an effect size and its CIs enables one to assess the relationships within data more effectively than the use of p values, re...
  3. Mechanisms of altered water metabolism in psychotic patients with polydipsia and hyponatremia.

    N Engl J Med 318(7):397-403 (1988) PMID 3340117

    We investigated the osmoregulation of water intake and antidiuretic function in psychiatric patients with polydipsia and hyponatremia and in matched controls with psychiatric illness but neither polydipsia nor hyponatremia. We found that a water load suppressed plasma osmolality and vasopressin and...