Advanced search×

Computed tomography alone versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of occult injuries to the cervical spine: a meta-analysis.

J Trauma 68(1):109-13; discussion 113-4 (2010) PMID 20065765

BACKGROUND: Ruling out injuries of the cervical spine in obtunded blunt trauma patients is controversial. Although computed tomography (CT) readily demonstrates fractures and malalignment, it provides limited direct evaluation of ligamentous integrity, leading some to advocate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in obtunded patients. Thus, the question remains: does adding an MRI provide useful information that alters treatment when a CT scan reveals no evidence of injury? METHODS: Published studies from 2000 to 2008 involving patients undergoing MRI for the purposes of further cervical spine evaluation after a "negative" CT scan were identified via a literature search of online databases. Data from eligible studies were pooled and original scale meta-analyses were performed to calculate overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and relative risk. The Q-statistic p value was used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding data on 1,550 patients with a negative CT scan after blunt trauma subsequently evaluated with a MRI. The MRI detected abnormalities in 182 patients (12%). Ninety traumatic injuries were identified, including ligamentous injuries (86/182), fractures, and dislocations (4/182). In 96 cases (6% of the cohort), the MRI identified an injury that altered management. Eighty-four patients (5%) required continued collar immobilization and 12 (1%) required surgical stabilization. The Q-statistic p value for heterogeneity was 0.99, indicating the absence of heterogeneity among the individual study populations. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on CT imaging alone to "clear the cervical spine" after blunt trauma can lead to missed injuries. This study supports a role for the addition of MRI in evaluating patients who are obtunded, or unexaminable, despite a negative CT scan.

DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c0b67a
Version: za2963e q8za9 q8zbc q8zc5 q8zda q8zeb q8zf0 q8zg0

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. C-arm-guided reduction of zygomatic fractures revisited.

    J Trauma 71(5):1371-5 (2011) PMID 21502882

    : In combined zygomatic fractures, the C-arm technique provides easy, flexible, and time-efficient adjustment. Its comprehensive imaging for zygomatic arch shape and body contour markedly facilitates the control of fracture reduction and protects against unexpected, unsatisfactory outcomes....
  2. Does CT evidence of a flat inferior vena cava indicate hypovolemia in blunt trauma patients with solid organ injuries?

    J Trauma 70(6):1358-61 (2011) PMID 21378583

    : CT evidence of FI is a good indicator of hypovolemia and an accurate predictor for prognosis in trauma patients with blunt solid organ injuries....
  3. Functional and health-related quality of life outcomes after pediatric trauma.

    J Trauma 70(6):1532-8 (2011) PMID 21427613

    : Seriously injured children showed ongoing disability and reduced HRQL 12 months after injury. The CHQ-PF28 and PedsQL, and the mGOS and KOSCHI, performed comparably. The FIM demonstrated considerable ceiling effects, and improvement over time was not shown. The results inform the methodology of ped...