Advanced search×

Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial.

Obstet Gynecol 115(3):503-10 (2010) PMID 20177280

OBJECTIVES: To compare satisfaction with and adherence to the contraceptive vaginal ring and a daily low-dose oral contraceptive pill (OCP) among college and graduate students using a novel method of electronic data collection. METHODS: We randomly assigned 273 women to the contraceptive vaginal ring (n=136) or OCP (n=137) for three consecutive menstrual cycles. Participants completed daily Internet-based, online diaries regarding method adherence and satisfaction during cycles of use. At 3 months, they completed an online survey regarding intention to continue their method and overall acceptability. At 6 months, we surveyed participants to see whether they continued using contraception and, if so, which method. RESULTS: Rates of loss to follow-up were similar between groups. Contraceptive vaginal ring users reported more perfect use in the first 2 months (P=.05). After the 3-month study period, 52 (43%) of 121 contraceptive vaginal ring users and 65 (52%) of 126 OCP users reported plans to continue their method (P=.16). However, at 6 months, only 31 (26%) of 117 contraceptive vaginal ring users and 36 (29%) of 123 OCP users had continued their assigned study method (P=.61). Almost 50% of both groups were using condoms or no method. CONCLUSION: Contraceptive vaginal ring users were more likely to report perfect use during the 3-month trial period than were OCP users. Despite randomization, participants were equally satisfied with their assigned hormonal contraceptive method. At 6 months, less than 30% of participants were still using their assigned method. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00635570.

DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45dc
Version: za2963e q8za0 q8zbe q8zc6 q8zdb q8zeb q8zf4 q8zgf

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Urinary and Anal Incontinence During Pregnancy and Postpartum: Incidence, Severity, and Risk Factors.

    Obstet Gynecol 115(3):618-628 (2010) PMID 20177295

    : The cumulative incidence rate during pregnancy was 39.1% (95% CI 36.3-41.9) for UI and 10.3% (95% CI 8.3-12.3) for anal incontinence. The correlation between severity of UI and effect on daily life was moderate. Age, baseline body mass index, and family history of UI were significantly associated w...
  2. Cost-containment and the need for medical justice reform.

    Obstet Gynecol 115(3):489-94 (2010) PMID 20177278

  3. Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery.

    Obstet Gynecol 117(4):877-82 (2011) PMID 21422859

    : To estimate the adequacy of antimicrobial activity of preoperative antibiotics at the time of cesarean delivery as a function of maternal obesity. : Twenty-nine patients scheduled for cesarean delivery were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) category, wit...