Advanced search×

A working model for the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists in the Australian Capital Territory.

Aust Health Rev 34(2):170-9 (2010) PMID 20497729

The extraordinary (unplanned) review of clinical privileges is the means by which an organisation can manage specific complaints about individual practitioners' clinical competence that require immediate investigation. To date, the extraordinary review of clinical privileges for doctors and dentists has not been the subject of much research and there is a pressing need for the evaluation and review of how different legislated and non-legislated administrative processes work and what they achieve. Although it seems a fair proposition that comprehensive processes for the evaluation of the clinical competence of doctors and dentists may improve the overall delivery of an organisation's clinical services, in fact, little is known about the relationship between the safety and quality of specific clinical services, procedures and interventions and the efficiency or effectiveness of established methodologies for the routine or the extraordinary review of clinical privileges. The authors present a model of a structured approach to the extraordinary review of clinical privileges within a clinical governance framework in the Australian Capital Territory. The assessment framework uses a primarily qualitative methodology, underpinned by a process of systematic review of clinical competence against the agreed standards of the CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework. The model is a practical, working framework that could be implemented on a hospital-, area health service- or state- and territory-wide basis in any other Australian jurisdiction.

DOI: 10.1071/AH08694
Version: za2963e q8za7 q8zb8 q8zc9 q8zd9 q8ze9 q8zf5 q8zg5

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair : Results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012.

    Hernia (2013) PMID 23673408

    A list of recommendations was formulated including more general issues on the scientific methodology and statistical approach. Standards and statements are available, each depending on the type of study that is being reported: the CONSORT statement for the Randomised Controlled Trials, the TREND sta...
  2. Factors associated with readmission following plastic surgery- a review of 10,669 procedures from 2011 American College of Surgeons Nation S...

    Plast Reconstr Surg (2013) PMID 23676965

    : A total of 10,669 patients were included with a 4.5% readmission rate. The study cohort was on average 49.5 years of age, 32.2% were obese, and 15.2% were smokers. The majority of patients were female (81.7%). Cases were predominantly outpatient procedures (65.6%). The most commonly performed proce...
  3. Repair of traumatic muscle herniation with acellular porcine collagen matrix.

    ANZ J Surg (2013) PMID 23672466

    All patients were pleased with their cosmetic and functional outcomes. All patients returned to work and sport 3 months after reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic hernias as a result of trauma can be safely reconstructed with a biological mesh implant. This approach can prevent complications from...