Advanced search×

Evaluation and management of post-LASIK dry eye syndrome.

Steven I SI Rosenfeld

Int Ophthalmol Clin 50(3):191-9 (2010) PMID 20611028

DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e3181e2469b
Version: za2963e q8za3 q8zba q8zca q8zd1 q8zeb q8zff q8zg8

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic complex regional pain syndrome Type I: five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized c...
    Marius A MA Kemler, Henrica C W HC de Vet, ... Maarten M van Kleef

    J Neurosurg 108(2):292-8 (2008) PMID 18240925

    Despite the diminishing effectiveness of SCS over time, 95% of patients with an implant would repeat the treatment for the same result....
  2. Spinal cord stimulation: indications and outcomes.
    Anthony W Lee and Julie G Pilitsis

    Neurosurg Focus 21(6):E3 (2006) PMID 17341047

    I was reviewed. Effective pain relief was obtained in 60 to 80% of patients with FBSS and CRPS Type I. Furthermore, these patients had significant improvements in quality of life (QOL) and a significantly greater chance of returning to work than patients who did not undergo SCS. The use of SCS in pa...
  3. Quantitative sensory testing for spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic neuropathic pain.
    Elon E Eisenberg, Misha-Miroslav MM Backonja, ... Milan P MP Stojanovic

    Audio, Transactions of the IRE Professional... 6(3):161-5 (2006) PMID 17147592

    Our findings, which agree with those of a few other studies, suggest that the vibration threshold and the tolerance to electrical stimulation at 5 and 250 Hz tests can assist the clinician to select the right patients for permanent stimulation....