Advanced search×

Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus-response rules.

Mem Cognit 38(6):677-88 (2010) PMID 20852232

For nearly two decades, researchers have investigated spatial sequence learning in an attempt to identify what specifically is learned during sequential tasks (e.g., stimulus order, response order, etc.). Despite extensive research, controversy remains concerning the information-processing locus of this learning effect. There are three main theories concerning the nature of spatial sequence learning, corresponding to the perceptual, motor, or response selection (i.e., central mechanisms underlying the association between stimulus and response pairs) processes required for successful task performance. The present data investigate this controversy and support the theory that stimulus-response (S-R) rules are critical for sequence learning. The results from two experiments demonstrate that sequence learning is disrupted only when the S-R rules for the task are altered. When the S-R rules remain constant or involve only a minor transformation, significant sequence learning occurs. These data implicate spatial response selection as a likely mechanism mediating spatial sequential learning.

DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.6.677
Version: za2963e q8zab q8zb3 q8zc3 q8zd3 q8zea q8zf0 q8zgf

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. An Immersed Boundary Method for Reaction-Diffusion Problems

    arXiv:1306.3159 [math.NA] 13 Jun 2013

    We develop an immersed-boundary approach to modeling reaction-diffusion Processes in dispersions of reactive spherical particles, from the Diffusion-limited to the reaction-limited setting. We represent each reactive Particle with a minimally-resolved "blob" using many less degrees of freedom Per pa...
  2. Invisible stimuli, implicit thresholds: Why "not-seen" judgments cannot be interpreted in isolation

    arXiv:1306.0756 [q-bio.NC] 4 Jun 2013

    I argue that this practice requires implicit assumptions about subjective measures of awareness incompatible with basic models of categorization under uncertainty (e.g., modern signal-detection and threshold theories). Most importantly, it ignores the potential effects of response bias. Instead of t...
  3. Ambiguous Interpretations of Dimensional Formulation of Physical Theories

    arXiv:1306.1616 [physics.gen-ph] 7 Jun 2013

    The interpretation of physical measurements/observations is generally ambiguous, simply because observers measure only the combined effect of spacetime dynamics and variation of the standard rulers; the two are observationally inseparable. All they can learn from observations is how dimensionless r...