Advanced search×

Neuraxial blockade in patients with preexisting spinal stenosis, lumbar disk disease, or prior spine surgery: efficacy and neurologic complications.

Anesth Analg 111(6):1511-9 (2010) PMID 20861423

Patients with spinal canal pathology, including spinal stenosis and lumbar disk disease, are often not considered candidates for neuraxial blockade because of the risk of exacerbating preexisting neurologic deficits or developing new neurologic dysfunction. In contrast, a history of spine surgery is thought to increase the likelihood of difficult or unsuccessful block. In this retrospective study we investigated the risk of neurologic complications and block efficacy in patients with preexisting spinal canal pathology, with or without a history of spine surgery, after neuraxial anesthesia.

DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f71234
Version: za2963e q8zae q8zbc q8zc4 q8zd0 q8ze4 q8zfe q8zg0

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Prospective ten-year follow-up study comparing patients with whiplash-associated disorders and asymptomatic subjects using magnetic resonanc...

    Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35(18):1684-90 (2010) PMID 20531071

    We conducted cross-sectional comparative study of 508 acute WAD patients and 497 asymptomatic volunteers, all of whom underwent MRI of the cervical spine. For this follow-up study, 133 WAD patients and 223 control subjects were recruited again. All participants underwent follow-up MRI and physical e...
  2. Prognosis following a second whiplash injury (Inj 2000;31:249-51).

    Injury 32(3):258-9; author reply 260 (2001) PMID 11293398

  3. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study on whiplash injury patients: minimum 10-year follow-up.

    Audio, Transactions of the IRE Profession... 14(5):602-10 (2009) PMID 19802673

    This study demonstrated that progression of degenerative changes of the cervical spine on MRI was not associated with clinical symptoms during the 10-year period after whiplash injury....