Advanced search×

Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer.

Br J Surg 97(12):1845-53 (2010) PMID 20922782

Minimally invasive approaches to oesophagectomy are being used increasingly, but there remain concerns regarding safety and oncological acceptability. This study reviewed the outcomes of totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO; 41 patients), hybrid procedures (partially minimally invasive; 34) and open oesophagectomy (46) for oesophageal cancer from a single unit.

DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7231
Version: za2963e q8zac q8zbe q8zc9 q8zd6 q8ze5 q8zf1 q8zge

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. [Comparative experimental study of colocolic anastomosis with manual suture and biofragmentable ring].

    Rev Assoc Med Bras 39(4):201-6 (1993) PMID 8162082

    BACKGROUND--The authors undertook an experimental trial, in order to compare one layer interrupted sutured large bowel anastomosis with that of biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR). This device creates an inverted serosa-to-serosa anastomosis. It is designed to fragment after hydrolysis and it is...
  2. [Experimental model for the examination of inner pressure tolerance of telescopic anastomosis and other frequently performed anastomosis typ...

    Magy Seb 54(4):239-44 (2001) PMID 11550493

    We have good results with telescopic anastomosis technique in partial oesophagectomies and gastrectomies. As we could not find data about the healing process of telescopic anastomoses so we started experimenting. Inside pressure tolerance was examined immediately after performing anastomoses by meas...