Advanced search×

A simple method for principal strata effects when the outcome has been truncated due to death.

Am J Epidemiol 173(7):745-51 (2011) PMID 21354986 PMCID PMC3070493

In randomized trials with follow-up, outcomes such as quality of life may be undefined for individuals who die before the follow-up is complete. In such settings, restricting analysis to those who survive can give rise to biased outcome comparisons. An alternative approach is to consider the "principal strata effect" or "survivor average causal effect" (SACE), defined as the effect of treatment on the outcome among the subpopulation that would have survived under either treatment arm. The authors describe a very simple technique that can be used to assess the SACE. They give both a sensitivity analysis technique and conditions under which a crude comparison provides a conservative estimate of the SACE. The method is illustrated using data from the ARDSnet (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network) clinical trial comparing low-volume ventilation and traditional ventilation methods for individuals with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq418
Version: za2963e q8zae q8zba q8zcd q8zd5 q8zeb q8zf2 q8zgc

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Breastfeeding and infant size: evidence of reverse causality.

    Am J Epidemiol 173(9):978-83 (2011) PMID 21430194 PMCID PMC3390166

    Infants who receive prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding grow more slowly during the first year of life than those who do not. However, infant feeding and growth are dynamic processes in which feeding may affect growth, and prior growth and size may also influence subsequent feeding...
  2. Invited commentary: causation or "noitasuac"?

    Am J Epidemiol 173(9):984-7; reply 988-9 (2011) PMID 21430191 PMCID PMC3121226

    Longitudinal studies are often viewed as the "gold standard" of observational epidemiologic research. Establishing a temporal association is a necessary criterion to identify causal relations. However, when covariates in the causal system vary over time, a temporal association is not straightforward....
  3. Caffeine intake, and the risk of stress, urgency and mixed urinary incontinence.

    J Urol 185(5):1775-80 (2011) PMID 21420114

    Findings suggest that high but not lower caffeine intake is associated with a modest increase in the incidence of frequent urgency incontinence. A fourth of the cases with the highest caffeine consumption would be eliminated if high caffeine intake were eliminated. Confirmation of these findings in...