Advanced search×

Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration.

PLoS Med 8(2):e1001009 (2011) PMID 21364968

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001009
Version: za2963e q8zac q8zb2 q8zc9 q8zde q8zee q8zf6 q8zg9
View PDF

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Skill Acquisition and Utilization During Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Childhood Disruptive Behavior Problems: A Review and Met...
    Oliver Lindhiem, Janelle Higa, and David J Kolko

    Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev (2013) PMID 23649324

    We review 85 empirical articles published since 2000 that measured the acquisition and/or utilization of parent management skills and/or child cognitive-behavioral skills in the context of an evidence-based treatment (EBT) for childhood behavior problems. Results showed that: (1) there are no standa...
    Buy PDF
  2. Multilevel Models From Biology to Psychology: Mission Impossible?
    Robert M Bilder, Andrew S Howe, and Fred W Sabb

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology (1906) (2013) PMID 23647123

    We need to define concepts, relations among concepts, and links to supporting evidence. Some methods already enable representation of concepts and measures at the levels of behavioral and basic biological processes, but a major gap at the level of neural circuitry must be bridged to link basic biolo...
    Buy PDF
  3. The Natural History of Actinic Keratosis: A Systematic Review.
    R N Werner, A Sammain, and A Nast

    Br J Dermatol (2013) PMID 23647091

    We indentified 24 eligible studies providing data on at least one of the outcomes. Progression rates of AKs to SCC ranged from 0% to 0.075%/lesion/year, with a risk of up to 0.53% per lesion when looking at participants with prior history of NMSC. Rates of regression of single lesions ranged between...
    Buy PDF