Advanced search×

Differences among quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research.

J Neurosci Nurs 43(4):230-2 (2011) PMID 21796046

All neuroscience nurses must be able to evaluate different avenues to inform their practice and solve clinical problems. The three methodologies discussed in this article have particular strengths in certain situations and require different skill sets, time, and resources. Quality improvement, evidence-based practice, and research are interconnected and inform each other. It can be difficult at times for the practitioners to identify the right method to answer clinical questions. The state of readiness for frontline staff to manage clinical problems with evidence-based practice and research must be advanced for the scientific knowledge employed by our profession to be visible in our clinical care.

DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e3182212ac3
Version: za2963e q8za3 q8zb2 q8zc8 q8zd8 q8zee q8zff q8zg6

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. The care span: The importance of transitional care in achieving health reform.

    Health Aff (Millwood) 30(4):746-54 (2011) PMID 21471497

    We conducted a systematic review of the research literature and summarized twenty-one randomized clinical trials of transitional care interventions targeting chronically ill adults. We identified nine interventions that demonstrated positive effects on measures related to hospital readmissions-a key...
  2. Validation of the Brazilian version of the Nursing Work Index-Revised (B-NWI-R).

    J Clin Nurs 20(23-24):3494-501 (2011) PMID 21749511

    Aims and objective.  The goal of this paper was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Nursing Work Index-Revised - Brazilian version (B-NWI-R). Background.  Some instruments evaluate the presence of certain characteristics in the professional practice environment of nur...