Advanced search×

Comparison of non-contact methods for the measurement of central corneal thickness.

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 42(5):400-7 (2011) PMID 21899245

This study examined the repeatability of and agreements between central corneal thickness measurements obtained by four different non-contact pachymetry devices.

DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20110812-02
Version: za2963e q8zaa q8zb5 q8zc0 q8zd9 q8ze3 q8zf7 q8zg5

Similar articles you may find interesting…

  1. Cell counting of body fluids: comparison between three automated haematology analysers and the manual microscope method.

    Int J Lab Hematol (2013) PMID 23647736

    Haematological analysis of body fluids (BF) specimens can provide clinicians with valuable diagnostic information because it can indicate one of several serious medical conditions. Although up to now the microscopic counting and the differentiation of WBC in a BF smear have been used as a reference....
  2. 'Masterstroke: a pilot group stroke prevention program for community dwelling stroke survivors'.

    Disabil Rehabil 35(11):931-8 (2013) PMID 23641954

    Participation in the Masterstroke program for community dwelling stroke survivors resulted in significant improvements in knowledge, functional balance, dietary behaviours and quality of life. Qualitative interviews support the participants' implementation of lifestyle changes essential for reducing...
  3. Invariant Criterion for the Design of Multiple Beam Profile Emittance and Twiss Parameters Measurement Sections

    arXiv:1305.1526 [physics.acc-ph] 7 May 2013

    We introduce and give examples of applications of an optimality criterion which can be used for the design and comparison of multiple beam profile emittance and Twiss parameters measurement sections and which is independent from the position of the reconstruction point.